Sufjan Stevens, You’re Pathetic
Let me first admit that before I had listened to a precious moment of Sufjan Stevens’ new album, Carrie & Lowell, I already had a feeling that I was going to write a negative review. I saw the album cover art and I knew what was coming. Icy nostalgia. Remember that opening sequence from the Wonder Years? Well, add in some Schindler’s List somehow accompanied by the drone of a wall-mounted air-conditioning unit from your long dead great aunt.
And, of course, I was going to love it. I fancy myself an artist, write a little music, I’m white and sometimes accused of being a hipster–of course I’m going to love it. (Is that racist?) Sufjan Stevens is pathetic and so am I.
[By all means, stream the album while you can from NPR for free while you read on. Click here.]
But my main criticism is aimed at the over-the-top praise coming from major publications/sites like Pitchfork, Rolling Stone and NPR. Here’s what some guy wrote for The Guardian describing the album some 8 hours ago,
His new album, Carrie & Lowell, a return to [his] narrative songwriting, is a fall-down gorgeous and emotionally devastating masterpiece prompted by the death of his mother, Carrie, in 2012 (and looking back on his strained relationship with his father and step-mother). It features some of the most beautiful music ever made about loss, and some of the most direct explorations of death ever recorded. It is a brutal, extremely sad, relentlessly wrenching record that, because it’s so exquisitely crafted, you might keep on a loop for days.
I get it, those of us with some emotional intelligence are starved for some thoughtful and poetic music, but for crying out loud, “Some of the most beautiful music ever made about loss?” Seriously? Okay, in fairness that description would probably disgust Mr. Sufjan as much as it should us. Anyone who does agree with that sentence probably doesn’t know very many songs.
What am I trying to say here? How can I admit that I love this music and dislike the album?
Certainly, part of what raises red flags for me is the fawning of the chattering NPR-listening class and the many breathless reviews, like the one above by Dave Egger–ostensibly a serious writer.
This is a thirty-nine year old man (he’ll be 40 in 4 months) writing music that sounds like the murmurings of a seventeen-year old sulking on his bed.
Shall we beat this or celebrate it?
You’re not the one to talk things through
You checked your texts while I masturbated– All of Me Wants All of You (Sufjan Stevens/Carrie & Lowell)
I’ll put it this way. To hold up an album of breathy, angst-ridden songs retracing awkward feelings about one’s parents as a pivotal achievement in English songwriting is a bad omen for the future of art in Western culture. (Not to mention this run-on sentence.)
Art, culture, design and seemingly life itself is stuck if not dead.
An article in Vanity Fair by Kurt Andersen nailed this point a few years ago,
Think about it. Picture it. Rewind any other 20-year chunk of 20th-century time. There’s no chance you would mistake a photograph or movie of Americans or an American city from 1972—giant sideburns, collars, and bell-bottoms, leisure suits and cigarettes, AMC Javelins and Matadors and Gremlins alongside Dodge Demons, Swingers, Plymouth Dusters, and Scamps—with images from 1992. Time-travel back another 20 years, before rock ’n’ roll and the Pill and Vietnam, when both sexes wore hats and cars were big and bulbous with late-moderne fenders and fins—again, unmistakably different, 1952 from 1972. You can keep doing it and see that the characteristic surfaces and sounds of each historical moment are absolutely distinct from those of 20 years earlier or later: the clothes, the hair, the cars, the advertising—all of it.
The same holds true for music, literature and architecture. The only thing that has aged this article and accompanying image is a slight resurgence of beards in the last two years.
So what are we to do? What should Sufjan do? Alas, Je suis Sufjan…
[I shouldn’t do this, but now that I’ve gotten mostly negative responses, I’m going to intervene here rather than edit the post—that wouldn’t be fair to the commenters. After this point I start quoting from Herman Melville, rambling about Bob Dylan and quoting Jesus. I knew it was getting too late when I started to quote E.E. Cummings! Yes, this is a rambling mess, but I do stand by the main point being a criticism of the over-the-top praise coming from major publications.]
I’m not entirely sure…But we can look back at what other thirty-nine year olds did. When Bob Dylan was 39, he had just put out the album “Saved,” upsetting his fans by essentially putting out a Christian sermon set to gospel-infused rock and roll.
And here’s Herman Melville at a robust 32. I like to think of this as the quiet climax of the book. A contemplation of stillness–You see, I don’t object to Sufjan’s subject matter–as the whalers wait spans of sixty or seventy minutes for a group of whales to surface. Trust me and dive in for this lengthy quote. Forgive me, I know, it’s almost the entire chapter!
At such times, under an abated sun; afloat all day upon smooth, slow heaving swells; seated in his boat, light as a birch canoe; and so sociably mixing with the soft waves themselves, that like hearth-stone cats they purr against the gunwale; these are the times of dreamy quietude, when beholding the tranquil beauty and brilliancy of the ocean’s skin, one forgets the tiger heart that pants beneath it; and would not willingly remember, that this velvet paw but conceals a remorseless fang.
These are the times, when in his whale-boat the rover softly feels a certain filial, confident, land-like feeling towards the sea; that he regards it as so much flowery earth; and the distant ship revealing only the tops of her masts, seems struggling forward, not though high rolling waves, but through the tall grass of a rolling prairie: as when the western emigrants’ horses only show their erected ears, while their hidden bodies widely wade through the amazing verdure. The long-drawn virgin vales; the mild blue hill-sides; as over these there steals the hush, the hum; you almost swear that play-wearied children lie sleeping in these solitudes, in some glad May-time, when the flowers of the woods are plucked. And all this mixes with your most mystic mood; so that fact and fancy, half-way meeting, interpenetrate, and form one seamless whole.
Nor did such soothing scenes, however temporary, fail of at least as temporary an effect on Ahab. But if these secret golden keys did seem to open in him his own secret golden treasuries, yet did his breath upon them prove but tarnishing.
Oh, grassy glades! oh, ever vernal endless landscapes in the soul; in ye, – though long parched by the dead drought of the earthy life, – in ye, men yet may roll, like young horses in new morning clover; and for some few fleeting moments, feel the cool dew of the life immortal on them. Would to God these blessed calms would last. But the mingled, mingling threads of life are woven by warp and woof: calms crossed by storms, a storm for every calm. There is no steady unretracing progress in this life; we do not advance through fixed gradations, and at the last one pause: – through infancy’s unconscious spell, boyhood’s thoughtless faith, adolescence’ doubt (the common doom), then scepticism, then disbelief, resting at last in manhood’s pondering repose of If. But once gone through, we trace the round again; and are infants, boys, and men, and Ifs eternally. Where lies the final harbor, whence we unmoor no more? in what rapt ether sails the world, of which the weariest will never weary? Where is the foundling’s father hidden? Our souls are like those orphans whose unwedded mothers die in bearing them: the secret of our paternity lies in their grave, and we must there to learn it.
And that same day, too, gazing far down from his boat’s side into that same golden sea, Starbuck lowly murmured: –
“Loveliness unfathomable, as ever lover saw in his young bride’s eye! – Tell me not of thy teeth-tiered sharks, and thy kidnapping cannibal ways. Let faith oust fact; let fancy oust memory; I look deep down and do believe.”
And Stubb, fish-like, with sparkling scales, leaped up in that same golden light: –
“I am Stubb, and Stubb has his history; but here Stubb takes oaths that he has always been jolly!”
Are you jolly, Mr. Sufjan?
You do claim to be a Christian. And I’m grateful for it. The word “God” was even still capitalized on the lyric sheet I was handed at the listening party I attended–bold stuff.
Another thirty-odd year old said,
If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it. For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works. – Matthew 16:24-27
Another gem,
If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. – Luke 14:26 #DifficultJesus
What do you say, Sufjan? Let’s tear this place up!
Don’t you see that his mother’s abandonment, distant father, and financially unstable upbringing forced him to grow up way too fast? He spent his first few decades just coping, through art, through relationships, through alcohol, through spiritual seeking. Now his mother dies, and he can’t push that past away any more.
Cut him some slack, instead of holding him to these arbitrary age-appropriate behaviors. That kind of rigid thinking is harmful.
Agreed
This was an incongruous mess. How apt that you described your review as contrarian. It seems you only dislike the album because so many enjoy it.
Nailed me…sort of…I actually dislike it because I like it. I don’t dislike the album, I’m critical of the album being heralded as a cultural achievement. I actually said “I love it” in the tortured and messy text above. Thanks for responding. I’m hugely influenced by Sufjan’s work – I’m just wondering if that is always a good thing. To prove my touchy feely music cred. Here’s my version of a William Blake poem:
🙂
I see your point of view and I agree with many points you’ve made. However, as an artist (visual not recording in my case) I can empathize with what he’s produced. I haven’t grieved in this way so I can’t emotionally relate, but I think that makes me an objective critic. Telling him to strap up his boots and be a man is telling him to quiet what ultimately influences his spirit. I gather you have more of an issue with the write up and not Steven’s himself, so defending this album isn’t my main agenda. I just think there is so much growth that happens in the process of work and artists (and hopefully Christians alike) recognize more than most, just how much growth there is to be had. I personally applaud him for working through that time in his life and sharing it as an album. I think it’s relatable for many and hopefully produces a platform for his music to only continue to develop.
I largely agree with you. This was really my first crack at cultural criticism and the new Sufjan album, for better and likely worse, was a vehicle that got me started. Actually, what really got me started was these paid writers at major publications calling it ‘some of the best music about grief ever written…’
Seems to me that you’re defending why others shouldn’t enjoy it rather than reviewing the album with valid criticism. Is there nothing to say on the composition of each piece, or is the fact that people are wrong to appreciate it your only overarching argument? You have every given right to criticize what’s been done wrong, but I’m not sure if your own social commentary on the album’s public consumption is the best track. I would much rather understand your dissection of the album, rather than a comparison to what you seem as ‘better.’
This is butt
Aaron Jones, stop writing shit, please. That is an outrage to Western culture itself.
the review starts:
Let me first admit that before I had listened to a precious moment of Sufjan Stevens’ new album, Carrie & Lowell, I already had a feeling that I was going to write a negative review.
Hmmmm….
Let me first admit that even before I read the first line of this review, I already had a feeling that it would be terribly inept.
Is this a review of the album or a review of reviews of the album?
Yeah, it was triggered by reviews of the album.
You say this was in reaction to the praise Carrie & Lowell is receiving from Pitchfork but as of March 29th the album still hasn’t been reviewed by Pitchfork. I don’t know why you would waste time writing a review about reviews of an album without spending the few short seconds it takes to actually see if it has been reviewed by the magazine you specifically call out for cajolery. Regarding your writing: it feels destitute of all the things that make writing a worthwhile pursuit. It is like every other personal blog; sort of a franchise gastropub style of writing and while well suited for flame polemics, it’s only about as deep as the iridescent stuff atop a puddle in a street. Furthermore, I cannot resist pointing out how repeatedly you engage in exactly that variety of nostalgia you decry in the article’s opening, citing better (certainly older) work – and judging by the precedent you set in this article – work that you wouldn’t have recognized as genius if you were around when it was released. I won’t even bother talking about the album. My original comment was about how it should be understood as a bildungsroman – how it compares favorably to Wallace Stevens work and a few modern lit movements – but because you chose to target reviewers, I decided instead to return the curteousy. These songs are among the best ever produced that deal with personal tragedy. You would be hard-pressed to find anything more personal, the song you linked is just peagentry. A beautiful folk song yes, but not one delivered beautifully by its original author. /
Pitchfork has 7 posts all on the new album. Most of them are probably just press releases sent to them, unedited. But there is also an interview including this sentence, “[Sufjan has invented] a new sort of 21st-century folklore…this creative strategy has led to him being regarded as one of the finest songwriters on the planet, it’s also taken a personal toll” Even without the addition of “it’s also taken a personal toll,” I stand by including Pitchfork in my complaint, messy as it is. The folk song I included was picked completely at random. It will always be a gamble (and silly) to claim that a new song is “among the best ever” without waiting at least 100 years. I hope we can spar about that when I have more time!
Pitchfork conversation with Sufjan: http://pitchfork.com/features/interviews/9595-true-myth-a-conversation-with-sufjan-stevens/
(It’s really worth reading!)
I’m afraid this ‘review’ relies on grasping at a mess of quotations that don’t grasp a common thread and are not unpacked with any real criticism. The reviewer claims Sufjan sounds like a seventeen year old, but quotes a line that doesn’t defend this perspective. Then there’s a massive quote from Melville that doesn’t serve any more purpose than… to be a quote from Melville. And a few biblical quotes thrown in at the end. I understand that the reviewer, in the comments section and not in the review itself, has argued that he likes/loves the album, but disagrees with the overwhelmingly positive reception of it. And yet, this review literally does NOTHING to refute the positive reception the album has gotten.
Here’s just a few reasons why Sufjan deserves every bit of the praise he’s receiving, from a lyrical point of view:
1. “Should have known Better.” There is a line “When I was three…” in this song. Then, over a minute later of singing, Sufjan rehashes the EXACT rhyme scheme from the previous stanza, but with a NEW snetiment and meaning. What Sufjan has done is create a continuity in the song that is usually only achieved through narrative songwriting. This song is not a strict narrative–plot point 1, 2, 3 consecutively–but rather an extended meditation. Creating this sort of continuity THROUGH meditation is a unique and well executed lyric tool.
2. Allusion. It may be because I’m studying Eliot right now, but the skillful implementation of allusion is fascinating for me. Sufjan engages in incredibly complex allusion making-usually biblical, but often turning a single word or phrase into an allusion to several different passages (black shroud, Rose of Aaron’s beard, Daniel’s message). He also draws from mythological sources (Medusa, Pegasus, Dido [I mean, please, fucking Dido]), historical events (Versailles, chimney swift), and the ever-beautiful American landscape (Spender’s Butte, the Dalles, Cottage Grove). What he has always been genius in, and continues to be lauded for, is his ability to, like Eliot and Chabon and other great authors, fold into contemporary topics and conversations an incredible point of reference with the past.
3. Album coherence. Like Age of Adz (less so in the other cases), Sufjan has built a narrative that progresses from song to song on this album in a way different from most of his other work. Sufjan (as character) starts at his mother’s deathbed, and witnesses her death in the first track. The following few songs follow a devolution in Sufjan’s emotional state, ultimately coming to a primal point in suicidal tension and a retreat into alcohol and drugs of his own. Then, with the title track, Sufjan brings us into memory, replacing the dying figure of Carrie with the character full of life from his own youth. “John my Beloved” twists religious allusion with highly charged sexual desire to show a reversal for Sufjan (again, as character), a moment when he comes back to the land of the living, instead of following his mother and spiraling out of control. The album concludes with, as I read it, Sufjan’s complicated relationship with himself as a musical icon. In many ways, the ambiguous ‘you’ of this track is as much his dead mother as it is us, his audience.
These are just a few of the reasons why Sufjan’s album not only deserves praise from critics, but perhaps critical study by scholars of music and poetry. And I do hope this response at least inspires the reviewer to, above all, be precise in his criticism, rather than shroud his argument behind quotations too steep for him to master. Perhaps he could learn a thing or two about effective quotation from Sufjan himself.
Fascinating stuff – I do love the allusions. You reminded me of “Ring them Bells” by Bob Dylan – I bet you know that?
The person who wrote this article should seriously reconsider pursuing a profession that involves intelligent thought in any capacity.
You’re kind of a jerk. This is a very meaningful album. Maybe you would appreciate it more if you were abandoned by a mother living with mental illness and addiction issues.
I’ll be the first to admit I’m a jerk and I listen to this album from time to time. I think my generation are pathetic and jerks. So, we all agree. 🙂 Happy New Year!