White House Responds: Amash NSA amendment not “open” enough
UPDATE: Rep. Justin Amash was interviewed and featured on NPR this morning. See player below. The White House has finally responded to a bipartisan amendment to reign in the NSA’s surveillance power by Justin Amash (R-MI) and co-sponsored by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI). The amendment is scheduled for a vote today. Warning, don’t take a drink. You might spit it out when you read this:
“…We oppose the current effort in the House to hastily dismantle one of our Intelligence Community’s counterterrorism tools. This blunt approach is not the product of an informed, open, or deliberative process. We urge the House to reject the Amash Amendment, and instead move forward with an approach that appropriately takes into account the need for a reasoned review of what tools can best secure the nation.”
We’ll post the full statement below. First, some creative responses from across the political spectrum:
WH: We oppose Amash/Conyers amdt de-funding bulk spying because it’s a “blunt approach” – unlike our bulk spying, which isn’t “blunt” at all
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) July 24, 2013
Pres Obama opposes my #NSA amendment, but American people overwhelmingly support it. Will your Rep stand with the WH or the Constitution?
— Justin Amash (@repjustinamash) July 24, 2013
WH: We’re against Amash/Conyers amendment because it’s not an “open” process, unlike what the FISA court & NSA do in total secrecy
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) July 24, 2013
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 23, 2013
Statement by the Press Secretary on the Amash Amendment
In light of the recent unauthorized disclosures, the President has said that he welcomes a debate about how best to simultaneously safeguard both our national security and the privacy of our citizens (Thanks to that vile traitor, Snowden!). The Administration has taken various proactive steps to advance this debate including the President’s meeting with the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, his public statements on the disclosed programs, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s release of its own public statements, ODNI General Counsel Bob Litt’s speech at Brookings, and ODNI’s decision to declassify and disclose publicly that the Administration filed an application with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. We look forward to continuing to discuss these critical issues with the American people and the Congress.
However, we oppose the current effort in the House to hastily dismantle one of our Intelligence Community’s counterterrorism tools. This blunt approach is not the product of an informed, open, or deliberative process. We urge the House to reject the Amash Amendment, and instead move forward with an approach that appropriately takes into account the need for a reasoned review of what tools can best secure the nation.
However, we oppose the current effort in the House to hastily dismantle one of our Intelligence Community’s counterterrorism tools. This blunt approach is not the product of an informed, open, or deliberative process. We urge the House to reject the Amash Amendment, and instead move forward with an approach that appropriately takes into account the need for a reasoned review of what tools can best secure the nation.
For activism details on how to support the Amash amendment, go here: http://iroots.org/2013/07/23/activism-alert-defund-the-nsa/
Contact your congress-critter today and demand they support the Amash/HR 2399 amnd to curtail NSA spying. Switchboard 202-224-3121
— iroots.org activism (@irootsorg) July 24, 2013